Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Triplett v. McVay
as 1:2023cv05452
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Triplett
Respondent:
Acting Warden Matthew McVay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Forest River Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00646
Defendant:
LDRV Holdings Corporated doing business as LazyDays RV and Forest River Incorporated doing business as Coachmen
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrews
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Garber v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Garber
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas Newton v. Georgia Luce
as 16-16603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS ANDREW NEWTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA LUCE
John Scannell v. Washington State Bar Associati, et al
as 14-35582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. SCANNELL, Esquire
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF WSBA, RUSSELL M. AOKII and others
Newton v. Luce et al
as 3:2013cv00542
Defendant:
Renee Baker and Georgia Luce
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Garber et al v. Garber et al
as 3:2012cv00181
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Garber, Z. G., J. G. and others
Defendant:
Sonya Lyn Garber, Josiah Christopher Becker, Ronald Eugene Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scannell v. Washington State Bar Association et al
as 2:2012cv00683
Plaintiff:
John R Scannell
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association, Board of Governors of WSBA, Russell M Aokii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longrange Furniture Company Ltd. v. Architectural Resource Team LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01601
Defendant:
Architectural Resource Team LLC, Stanley M. Kelly, Susan Kelly and others
Unknown:
Gus W Flangas, Gus W Flangas, Gus W Flangas and others
Plaintiff:
Longrange Furniture Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
