Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Miguel Benitez-Garay v. Dept. of Homeland Security, et al
as 19-50242
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL BENITEZ-GARAY
Santoyo v. Bexar Cty
as 19-50124
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL BIBLE, United States Immigration and Enforcement, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ENRIQUE M. LUCERO, Field Office Director for the San Antonio Field Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO TRUJILLO SANTOYO
Dong v. Nielsen et al
as 6:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Director of Jail George C Zoley, Secretary of DHS Kirstjen Michele Nielsen, US Attorney General Matthew George Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Jing Kui Dong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv03266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02018
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00398
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
