Cases 1 - 10 of 346
Johnson v. Doe
as 6:2024cv03320
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KELLY v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
MARLIN KELLY
Defendant:
MS. RUDZIENSKI and THOMAS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Middlebrooks v. Kasmar et al
as 1:2024cv04257
Plaintiff:
Lillie M. Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Scott Kasmar, Kay Ann King and Bryan Thomas Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
Richard Davis
Defendant:
Esther Waller, Rick Dudley, Thomas Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Norfleet Land Services
as 7:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Norfleet Land Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 (b) FLSA: Minimum Wage or Overtime Compensation
Middlebrooks v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lillie M. Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Judge Bryan Thomas Johnson and Leigh Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams James, et al. v. Bank of America, National Association, et al.
as 24-3870
Plaintiff:
MARIA WILLIAMS JAMES, NATHAN EARL AIWOHI, TOBY ALAMOANA KEOHOKAPU and others
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02993
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Dr. Moose et al
as 6:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Moose and Nurse Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
