Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02836
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MONROE et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv15954
Plaintiff:
LARZETTA MONROE and THOMAS MONROE
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION.
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe v. S. Makey et al
as 1:2017cv01435
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Monroe
Defendant:
S. Makey and Reiss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MONROE et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
JANE MILLER MONROE and S. THOMAS MONROE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
MONROE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv04142
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Plaintiff:
Thomas Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas Monroe v. SmithKline Beecham, et al
as 10-3220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS MONROE
Defendant - Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline
MONROE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv02140
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MONROE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
