Cases 81 - 90 of 110
Powers v. Scott et al
as 3:2014cv03148
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Danielle Walker and Paul Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
as 3:2014cv00718
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Powers v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
as 3:2014cv03061
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Powers v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 13-2579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, GLADYS TAYLOR, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, MICHAEL P. RANDLE, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Powers et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv20211
Plaintiff:
Vickie Powers and Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powers et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-20211
Plaintiff:
Vickie Powers and Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Thomas Powers v. Nedra Chandler
as 13-2361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEDRA CHANDLER, Warden
Thomas Powers v. Lamar Coleman, et al
as 13-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
LAMAR COLEMAN, Danville Correction Center Chaplain and STEVE KEIM
Powers v. Lochard et al
as 3:2013cv03134
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Hugh Lochard, Michael Bednarz, Wexford Health Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Hankins et al
as 3:2013cv03097
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Joseph Hankins, James Christopher Clayton, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
