Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rogers v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hafner v. DeLaura et al
as 6:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Hafner
Defendant:
Unknown DeLaura, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Murdock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose et al v. Mosley et al
as 6:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Nurse Murray, Jamie Mosley and Lt. Burns
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Stinnett, Tyler Thomas Roger Rose and Tony Allen Stamper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose et al v. Mosley et al
as 1:2021cv00062
Defendant:
Jamie Mosley, Lt. Burns and Sgt. Murray
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Stinnett, Tyler Thomas Roger Rose and Tony Allen Stamper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins-Craig et al v. Doe et al
as 1:2020cv03723
Plaintiff:
Justin Collins-Craig
Defendant:
John Doe and Thomas Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 5:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Frank Leonard, William Jones Kieth, Thomas Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Borden et al
as 1:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Arthor Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
John Borden and Core Civic Correction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Rogers et al
as 6:2016cv01378
Plaintiff:
Wendell A Lee
Defendant:
Thomas Rogers, Robert E Stevens, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
