Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SNELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19254
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SNELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richardson et al v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Rodrick L. Richardson, Charles Low, Walter Christian and others
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Superior Courts, Georgia Public Defender Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwin Thomas Snell v. Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2021cv00474
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Any and All Unknown Defendants, Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Thomas Snell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwin Snell v. Craig Koenig
as 19-70957
Respondent:
CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden
Petitioner:
EDWIN THOMAS SNELL
Edwin Snell v. Jeffrey Beard
as 14-55699
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWIN THOMAS SNELL
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
VanWert v. Essexville et al
as 2:2014cv11593
Plaintiff:
Michael VanWert
Defendant:
Essexville, City of , Michael Schartow and Thomas Snelling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwin Snell v. Edmund Brown, et al
as 13-55846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN THOMAS SNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Attorney General, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, STEVE COOLEY and others
Edwin Thomas Snell v. Matthew Cate
as 2:2012cv07021
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Petitioner:
Edwin Thomas Snell
Edwin Thomas Snell v. Edmund G Brown et al
as 2:2012cv06118
Defendant:
C P Andicochen, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown, California Dept of Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Thomas Snell
Snell v. Brown et al
as 2:2012cv01779
Plaintiff:
Edwin Thomas Snell
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Kamala D. Harris, Steve Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
