Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Clervrain et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Emmanuel Benjoassint and others
Defendant:
Mark Walker, Sandra Watson, Ken Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7238
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6638
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Neese v. Barr et al
as 7:2020cv00260
Defendant:
Thomas T. Cullen, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Brooke Neese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
David Meyers v. US Marshal's Office
as 19-7845
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS T. CULLEN, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Virginia, A. VANHUSS, CARL MANIS, Warden and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, B. RAVIZEE MONAHAN, QMHP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Roanoke U.S. Attorney
as 19-7363
Respondent / Appellee:
ROANOKE UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE, THOMAS T. CULLEN, U.S. Attorney, FBI, Richmond & Roanoke Field Office and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00573
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00572
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
