Cases 11 - 20 of 333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mattingly v. California Department of Parks and Recreation et al
as 5:2023cv03754
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Mattingly
Defendant:
California Department of Parks and Recreation, Pete Estes, Alex Tabone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lemond v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Deborah J. Lemond
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority, David C. Macdonald DO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
David Monroe vs Shari Dixon, et al
as 2:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
David Monroe
Defendant:
RN Shari Dixon, RN Pat Brown, MD John R Holdman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
