Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Thornton v. USA
as 5:2023cv05073
Petitioner:
Jeremy Thornton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hanan v. Overlook Partners LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jakie Hanan
Defendant:
Overlook Partners LLC doing business as Steep Hill Arkansas, Brandon Thornton, Brent Whittington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Thornton v. Sharp County Detention Center et al
as 3:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Richard Thornton
Defendant:
Sharp County Detention Center and Edith Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv04114
Plaintiff:
Thomas Derek Thornton
Defendant:
Warden Walker, Captain Adams, Lieutenant Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. The United States of America
as 4:2022cv04064
Plaintiff:
Chazz Parish Thornton
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plumlee et al v. Steep Hill Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Don Plumlee, Jakie Hanan and Pete Edwards
Defendant:
Steep Hill Inc, Steep Hill Arkansas, Brent Whittington and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thornton v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 5:2022cv05077
Plaintiff:
Annie Thornton
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Thornton v. Seamster et al
as 4:2021cv00819
Plaintiff:
Carl Thornton
Defendant:
L Seamster, Pattie Conley, Jared Byers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott et al v. Walmart Inc
as 3:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Abbott, Meagan Albert, Sophia Alfaro and others
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thornton v. Payne
as 4:2021cv00662
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thornton
Defendant:
Dexter L Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
