Cases 41 - 50 of 51
In re: Time Warner Cable Inc.
as 14-153
Petitioner:
In re: TIME WARNER CABLE INC. and TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC
Respondent:
CONSTELLATION TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Velasquez v. Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC
as 3:2014cv03000
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC
Plaintiff:
Alberto Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Southern California Edison Company v. Ace American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv06061
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company, ESIS Inc and Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC
Plaintiff:
Southern California Edison Company
Cando v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03173
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Cando
Defendant:
The City of New York, Raymond Walter Kelly, The Associated Press and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Los Angeles v. Time Warner Cable Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01984
Plaintiff:
City of Los Angeles
Defendant:
Does, TW NY Cable Holdings Inc, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC and others
Danehy v. Time Warner Cable Enterprise LLC
as 5:2014cv00133
Plaintiff:
Timothy P. Danehy
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable Enterprise LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 222
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. Time Warner Cable Inc., et al
as 2:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
C-Cation Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable Inc., , Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC , Time Warner Cable Texas LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CRFD Research Inc. v. Time Warner Cable Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
CRFD Research Inc.
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable Inc. and Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
