Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Wallace v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2022cv02556
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant:
State of Texas, City of Dallas, The City of Dallas Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Lumpkin
as 21-11050
Petitioner / Appellant:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Wallace v. Davis
as 21-11048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, William Gonzalez, L. Dody and others
Peterson v. American Tire Distributors, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02004
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 4, American Tire Distributors, Inc., Timothy B. Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Darius D. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wallace v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2021cv00009
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALLACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73459
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DEWAYNE WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv62884
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DALE WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 7:2020cv00025
Defendant:
William Gonzalez, L Dody, R Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2019cv00127
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Southern Cable Systems, LLC et al (MAG2)
as 2:2019mc03874
Petitioner:
Allied Eastern Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Jerry Russell Tyler and Southern Cable Systems, LLC
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Wallace
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
