Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Wingfield v. Phams
as 1:2024cv02221
Petitioner:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EGANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05312
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BERNARD EGANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Timothy Wingfield v. Jeffrey Mann, et al
as 20-14371
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY MANN, Sheriff of Dekalb County Jail, MELODY M. MADDOX, Superintendent of Dekalb County Jail, MICHAEL L. THURMOND, Director/Commissioner of Dekalb County Jail and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BERNARD WINGFIELD
Kilgore et al v. McGee
as 2:2020cv00194
Defendant:
Timothy Bernard McGee, Jr. and GEICO Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Shaundra L Kilgore and John Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BERNARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv98497
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wingfield v. Mann et al
as 1:2020cv02136
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann, Michael L. Thurmond, Melody M. Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy TannerIn re: Timothy Tanner
as 20-10510
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: TIMOTHY BERNARD TANNER
USA v. Timothy Tanner
as 20-10506
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BERNARD TANNER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sapp v. Federal Retirement Investment Board et al
as 2:2018cv04042
Defendant:
Ravindra Deo, Federal Retirement Investment Board and Ivory Jinnie
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Sapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
