Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Julie Hamstead v. D. Walker
as 20-1650
Defendant:
THE CITY OF RANSON, WEST VIRGINIA, KELLY HALBERT, RN, KYLE REED KOPPENHAVER, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIE ANN HAMSTEAD
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER D. R. WALKER, individually
Julie Hamstead v. West Virginia State Police
as 19-2122
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEN SHUTTS, THE WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, CITY OF CHARLES TOWN, West Virginia and others
Defendant:
D. R. WALKER, in his official capacity, AB, an unknown individual known as the West Virginia Department of Highways "Muscle Man" on the 2016 Ranson-Charles Town Green Corridor Fairfax Boulevard Project, X, Y AND Z, unknown persons who conspired and/or aided and abetted in the fabrication of false criminal charges against Julie Hamstead and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIE ANN HAMSTEAD
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2019cv00089
Defendant:
County of Marion, Trooper Timothy Morris, Jeffery Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Preston Field, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamstead v. West Virginia State Police et al
as 3:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Julie Ann Hamstead
Defendant:
West Virginia State Police , D.R. Walker , The City of Ranson, West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Corey Adams v. Timothy Morri
as 10-1527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY ADAMS and TYLER BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY MORRIS, (Individually and in his capacity as agent/owner of T.L. Morris Seafood, Inc.) and T.L. MORRIS SEAFOOD, INCORPORATED
Corey Adams v. Timothy Morri
as 10-1526
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COREY ADAMS and TYLER BENNETT
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY MORRIS, (Individually and in his capacity as agent/owner of T.L. Morris Seafood, Inc.) and T.L. MORRIS SEAFOOD, INCORPORATED
Adams v. Morris et al
as 1:2008cv02404
Plaintiff:
Corey Adams and Corey Adams
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Timothy Morris, T. L. Morris Seafood, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
