Cases 1 - 8 of 8
John Mark v. Keith Ellison, et al
as 26-1118
Petitioner:
John Mark
Respondent:
Keith M. Ellison, Stephen F. Simon, Timothy Walz and others
Stewart v. Walz et al
as 0:2025cv01330
Plaintiff:
Professor Russell Stewart
Defendant:
Timothy Walz, Patricia Rogers, Linda S. Kingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stobbe v. Stibor et al
as 2:2024cv04258
Defendant:
President Joseph Biden, Governor Timothy Walz, Atty Gen Merrick Gardland and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Stobbe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MN Chapter of Assoc. Builders, et al v. Keith Ellison, et al
as 24-3116
Plaintiff:
Laketown Electric Corporation, National Federation of Independent Business, Inc. and Minnesota Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors
Defendant:
Timothy Walz, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Minnesota, Nicole Blissenbach, in her official capacity as the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry and Keith M. Ellison, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Minnesota
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 re Job Discrimination (Religion)
Shavelle Chavez-Nelson v. Gov. Timothy Walz, et al
as 22-2304
Petitioner / Appellant:
Shavelle Oscar Chavez-Nelson, In Propria Persona: Ex Relatione
Respondent / Appellee:
Governor Timothy Walz and Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections
Overby v. Simon et al
as 0:2020cv02250
Defendant:
Timothy Walz and Steve Simon
Plaintiff:
Paula M Overby
Intervenor:
Angela Craig and Jenny Winslow Davies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walz et al v. Randall et al
as 1:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Candi Walz and Timothy Walz
Defendant:
Joseph Quandt, Brian Randall, Dennis Kucera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
