Cases 1 - 10 of 1,007
Oldham v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02148
Plaintiff:
Tina Oldham
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Breeding v. Air Evac EMS, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Tina Breeding
Defendant:
Air Evac EMS, Inc. doing business as Air Evac Lifeteam and Morgan Wiljanen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Webb, et al v. Tenn Mor Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kathryn WEBB
Defendant:
TENN MOR PROPERTIES, LLC, Adam Tripp, Tina K Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stephens v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Tina Stephens
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bess v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
Tina Bess
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McVeigh v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01678
Plaintiff:
Tina L McVeigh
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patton v. Ealey et al
as 5:2024cv10771
Plaintiff:
Steven Patton
Defendant:
Tina Ealey, R. Green, Peterson and others
Catron v. Payne et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Catron
Defendant:
Tina Payne, Belinda Moffitt, Sherri Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Moran v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Tina Moran
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
