Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kirk et al v. City of Duluth, Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kirk and Amy Kirk
Defendant:
City of Duluth, Minnesota, Gordon Ramsay, Michael Ceynowa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Meikle et al v. City of Republic, Missouri et al
as 6:2017cv03191
Defendant:
City of Republic, Missouri, Michael Lawton and John Tinsley
Claimant:
Mavis Meikle, Courtnie Meikle, Stevanna Meikle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Meikle et al v. City of Republic et al
as 6:2017cv03194
Defendant:
City of Republic, John Tinsley and Michael Lawton
Plaintiff:
Mavis Meikle , Courtnie Meikle , Stevanna Meikle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Douglas Coleman v. Duluth Police Department, et al
as 09-2002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Douglas Hiram Coleman
Defendant:
Duluth Police Department
Defendant - Appellee:
Chief Gordon Ramsay, Officer Tinsley, and other unidentified Duluth Police Officers, both individually and in their official capacity, Fond Du Luth Casino-Security and others
Doletha Tinsley, et al v. Housing Authority, et al
as 08-3394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Doletha Tinsley, Corine Batts, Bertha Doss and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Housing Authority of Kansas City and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Interested Party:
TAG Associates of Kansas City, Inc., Special Master
Peterman v. Tinsley et al
as 3:2007cv00047
Plaintiff:
Mary Peterman and Mary Peterman
Defendant:
Derrick Tinsley, Great Dane Limited Partnership and Great Dane Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal-Employment Discrimination
Coleman v. Duluth Police Department et al
as 0:2007cv00473
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hiram Coleman
Defendant:
Gordon Ramsey, R. Tinsley, Fond du Luth Casino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
