Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Marrero v. Dallas Mayors Office et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Tito E Marrero
Defendant:
Dallas Mayors Office, City Attorneys Office, Dallas New Building Department and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Tito Marrero v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 24-1046
Plaintiff:
TITO E. MARRERO
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, JENNIFER WRIGHT, Loan Officer, SHARON MIDDLEBROOKS and others
MARRERO v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
TITO E. MARRERO
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, JENIFER WRIGHT, SHARON MIDDLEBROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Marrero v. Anthony et al
as 1:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Stephen Anthony, David Kasulones, Private Security Company Contracted at Louis Stokes for Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marrero v. Veterans Administration et al
as 1:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, Christopher Robey, Myron Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marrero v. Vecchiarelli et al
as 1:2016cv01693
Plaintiff:
Tito E Marrero
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli, Solomon Oliver, Jr., F.B.I. Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrero v. Coughlan et al
as 2:2015cv02042
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Jonathan E. Coughlan, Richard A Dove, Lori J. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marrero v. Miller et al
as 2:2015cv01140
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Miller , Reilhe , Litzenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tito Marrero v. Belmont Correctional Institut
as 14-3712
Petitioner - Appellant:
TITO E MARRERO
Respondent - Appellee:
BELMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Tito Marrero v. James Miraldi, et al
as 14-3190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITO E MARRERO
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MIRALDI and BETH WHITMORE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
