Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Thompson v. Todd et al
as 3:2025cv00251
Plaintiff:
Jamien Thompson
Defendant:
Todd Harrell and Kaycee Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Hall et al
as 3:2025cv00139
Plaintiff:
Roy B Flowers
Defendant:
Kaycee Hall, Todd Harrell and Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Boyd et al
as 3:2025cv00131
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Marty Boyd, Todd Harrell, Keith Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01443
Plaintiff:
TODD HARRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carter v. Boyd et al
as 3:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert D Carter
Defendant:
Marty Boyd, Keith Bowers and Todd Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Boyd et al
as 3:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Skye A Burns
Defendant:
Marty Boyd, Todd Harrell, Keith Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Black et al
as 3:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Toscar Smith
Defendant:
Black, Todd Harrell, Marty Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadcast Music, Incorporated, et al v. Broadway Bar, Incorporated, et al
as 13-50635
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INCORPORATED, EMI VIRGIN SONGS, INCORPORATED, DAVID ERIC GROHL, doing business as MJ Twelve Music and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT KARAM, Individually
Tacey Goss P.S. v. Barnhart et al
as 2:2013cv00800
Plaintiff:
Tacey Goss P.S.
Defendant:
Donna Barnhart , Women's Health Developers Inc , Chicfit Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tacey Goss, P.S. v. Donna Barnhart, et al
as 13-35056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TACEY GOSS, P.S., a Washington corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
DONNA BARNHART, individually, WOMEN'S HEALTH DEVELOPERS, INC., an Arkansas corporation, CHICFIT, INC., a Missouri company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
