Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 5:2023cv01042
Petitioner:
Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent:
FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burchett v. Bates
as 6:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Eugene S. Burchett
Respondent:
Tom Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Pettigrew
as 4:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Wayne L Allen
Respondent:
Tom Bates and Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blankenship et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
John Hayden Blankenship, Haylee Blankenship, Delsie Mae Pye and others
Defendant:
John Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Inhofe et al
as 4:2022cv00474
Defendant:
John Stitt, James M Inhofe, James Lankford and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Fontenot v. Ada, City of et al
as 6:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Karl Fontenot
Defendant:
Ada, City of, Mike Baskin, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn v. DCP Midstream LP
as 5:2021cv00658
Plaintiff:
Tom Lynn
Defendant:
DCP Midstream LP and DCP Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
