Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wankett v. Cooper et al
as 3:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Wankett
Defendant:
Robert Cooper, Forest Acres Police Department and Gene Sealy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
US v. Tony Gregg
as 20-6997
Defendant / Appellant:
TONY ALLEN GREGG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.
as 17-1960
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.
as 17-1960
:
In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KBR, INCORPORATED, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, LLC, HALLIBURTON COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ERKA LTD
ALLEN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv00498
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and FAY GRIFFIN
Plaintiff:
TONY ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Herrin v. Perry
as 3:2015cv00418
Petitioner:
Tony Allen Herrin
Respondent:
Frank L. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gregg v. USA
as 3:2012cv00699
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tony Allen Gregg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Tony Gregg
as 10-4199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY ALLEN GREGG
US v. Tony Gregg
as 10-4198
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TONY ALLEN GREGG
Kelleck et al v. KBR Inc et al
as 8:2009cv03304
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelleck, Dan Bowlds, Tony Allen Gouckenour and others
Defendant:
KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown and Root Services Inc, Kellogg Brown and Root LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
