Cases 31 - 40 of 347
Bosch v. Thurman et al
as 4:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Melissa Bosch
Defendant:
Tony Thurman, Cabot Public School District and Cabot Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hatfield v. Cesar Ornelas, et al
as 5:2022cv05110
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Hatfield, P.A.
Defendant:
Cesar Ornelas, Steven Kherker, Michael McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McCoy v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Tony McCoy
Defendant:
Tischa Johnson, Key, Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Johnson et al
as 5:2022cv05048
Plaintiff:
Tony McCoy
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Tischa Johnson, Lieutenant Key, Deputy Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Davis et al
as 2:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Kelley
Defendant:
Brandon Davis, Toni Shockey and Keitrich Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargrove et al v. Power Transport LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Starline Hargrove and Dawarka Hargrove
Defendant:
Power Transport LLC and Toni Lynn Lezama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Richardson v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Angela Schuncey Richardson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Keith Waddle, Toni Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelsey v. Cobb et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Tony Kelsey
Defendant:
Mary Cobb, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Fiserv, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv05012
Plaintiff:
Stanley Rogers
Defendant:
Fiserv, Inc., First Data Corporation, Tony Marino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniels v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2021cv01242
Plaintiff:
Tony Daniels, Jr
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
