Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust, Calvin Klein, Inc. and Tommy Hilfiger Licensing LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A3BLNLNXHKGVR5, Huomeng and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Toomes v. Working et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Antonio Toomes
Defendant:
Michael Ryan Working and Clayburn Peeples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toomes v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv02325
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Martavius Toomes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jordan v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2020cv01478
Defendant:
Terrell Thrower, Josh Culberson, Warden Upton and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Hardy Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00456
Plaintiff:
Pshawn Oliver, Donald Peoples, Walter Patrick and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker and Donna Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Holt et al
as 3:2019cv00455
Plaintiff:
Pshawn Oliver, Kedrick Carwell, Audarius Watts and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker
Petitioner:
Anthonhy Draine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toomes v. USA
as 6:2019cv00041
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas Toomes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Thomas Toomes
as 19-5099
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS TOOMES
MCALLISTER v. TOOMES et al
as 1:2018cv00690
Defendant:
ELISABETH TOOMES, PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, THE 21ST PROSECUTORS OFFICE IN FORSYTH COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON T. MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. McCormick et al
as 3:2018cv00138
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Avery
Defendant:
Barrett, Byrne, Pamela Delporto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
