Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Toto v. Inframark, LLC et al
as 8:2026cv01806
Plaintiff:
Robert A Toto
Defendant:
INFRAMARK, LLC, Western Alliance Bancorporation, Leland Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00385
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rasmus v. Kuntz et al
as 3:2026cv00462
Plaintiff:
Theron Rasmus
Defendant:
Deborah Kuntz, Irene Toto and Sheriff Michelle Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Jordan (Acevedo)
as 26-153
Defendant:
KEITH JORDAN, BRIAN HANNA, KATINA REED and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Toto Allan v. Johnston
as 0:2026cv00397
Petitioner:
Peter Ista Toto Allan and Peter Allan George
Respondent:
Nancy Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv06004
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rasmus v. Clerk of Court, Clay County et al
as 3:2025cv01562
Plaintiff:
Theron Rasmus
Defendant:
Judge Angela Cox, Brittany Goss, Brianna Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company v. TOTO USA, Inc.
as 4:2025cv05831
Defendant:
TOTO USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rasmus v. Toto et al
as 3:2025cv01148
Plaintiff:
Theron Rasmus
Defendant:
CEO Irene Toto, Case Manager Brittany Goss, Case Supervisor Brianna Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
