Cases 41 - 50 of 3,639
LOWE v. TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING INDIANA, INC.
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
DAVID LOWE
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING INDIANA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Anthony Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt and Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
Anthony Anderson, Muhammad Ali Jr., Albuquerque International Support and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A and ai804
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Beckett v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. INC.
as 7:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Wesley Beckett
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Altier, et al. v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc, et al.
as 24-76
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARK ALTIER, ALEJANDRA RENTERIA, SAMUEL CHOC and others
Appellant:
JOHN KRESS and DIANE HAASE
Defendant / Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA and TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
