Cases 71 - 80 of 92
Travis Webb v. Director, Virginia Department
as 13-7675
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRAVIS JAMES WEBB
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
James v. S.C.C.F. et al
as 2:2013cv05011
Defendant:
Demarco, Division of Parole, John Doe 2:13cv5011 Parole Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Travis James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baum v. Douglas et al
as 1:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Curtis Baum
Defendant:
Nancy Douglas, Billie Crocker, Citytrust Real Estate Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mullis v. Davis
as 3:2013cv00121
Petitioner:
Travis James Mullis
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
James v. SCCF et al
as 2:2013cv02344
Defendant:
County Sheriff Demarco, Division of Parole, Bill Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Travis James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
LUCY ANDERSON , JOHN ALONGIS , JAMES BAILEY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bico Drilling Tools, Inc. v Trintiy Energy
as 4:2012cv00610
Plaintiff:
Bico Drilling Tools, Inc.
Defendant:
Trinity Energy Services, LLC and Travis James Laman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00215
Defendant:
City of New York, Thomas Daly, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Travis James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
as 3:2011cv00792
Petitioner:
Travis James Webb
Respondent:
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Travis Webb v. Faye Mitchell
as 11-7067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS JAMES WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
FAYE W. MITCHELL, Court Clerk, Chesapeake Circuit Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
