Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hatcher v. Yang et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Robert L Hatcher
Defendant:
Sylvain Yang and Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zahn v. Flathead County et al
as 9:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Amanda L. Zahn
Defendant:
Flathead County, Jeffrey J. Perry, Travis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANTHONY v. HOULTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
JAMES A ANTHONY
Defendant:
HOULTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, TRAVIS SMITH and OFFICER 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hill v. Wyatt et al
as 5:2022cv01359
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hill
Defendant:
Ricky Dale Wyatt, Robert L Smith, Cpl Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 (DO NOT USE)
Lastra v. Pudovkin et al
as 1:2021cv07759
Plaintiff:
James Lastra and Jamie Lastra
Defendant:
Patrick Doe, Vlad Pudovkin, Brian Travis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson et al v. Gill et al
as 6:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Richard Fredricks, Gregory Magnus, Incorporated City of Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Alexi Elias Ghenatos, Christina Chapman, Amanda Dupray-Raley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Luxottica of America, d/b/a Lenscrafters
as 6:2020cv00954
Defendant:
Luxottica of America, d/b/a Lenscrafters and Luxottica of America a foreign for profit corporation doing business as LensCrafters
Plaintiff:
Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Coddington et al
as 6:2019cv06680
Defendant:
Steuben County Family Court, Judge Mathew K. McCarthy, Judge David E. Coddington and others
Plaintiff:
James Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
