Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Trotter #362064 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Jermain D Trotter
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Maria M Carkuff, D W Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwine v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Erwine
Defendant:
United States of America, Churchill County, Benjamin Trotter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
v. Erwine et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Defendant:
Michael Erwine, United States of America, Churchill County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Snow v. Women's HealthCare Associates, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01393
Plaintiff:
Lynita Snow
Defendant:
Women's HealthCare Associates, LLC, Candace Trotter and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Schroeder v. Soulsby et al
as 2:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Chris Schroeder
Defendant:
Ed Soulsby, Mary Trotter, Trotter & Soulsby PA Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
(PS) Trotter v. Sacramento Housing Program et al
as 2:2022cv01552
Plaintiff:
Cupid Monique Trotter
Defendant:
Sacramento Housing Program, LaShelle Dozier, Sarah O. Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(HC) Trotter v. State of CA
as 3:2022cv00753
Petitioner:
James Trotter
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Trotter v. State of CA
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
James Trotter
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Trotter v. People of the State of Calfornia
as 2:2021cv02266
Petitioner:
Bobby Earl Trotter
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
