Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JOHNSON v. TROXEL et al
as 1:2021cv02303
Plaintiff:
SHERLYNN JOHNSON
Defendant:
IVAN TROXEL, UW PROVISION TRANSFER LLC and UW PROVISION TRANSFER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MidLand LLC et al v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
as 1:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Troxel, MidLand LLC, Westland Park LLC and others
Defendant:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Troxell v. USA
as 3:2019cv00620
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Eugene Troxell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
STANTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00137
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SANDRA TROXEL
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. STANTON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANTON v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORR. et al.
as 2:2018cv00120
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORR. and SANDRA TROXEL
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALAN STANTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troxell v. Warden
as 3:2017cv00756
Petitioner:
Bobby Troxell
Respondent:
Warden
Miscellaneous_party:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REAVES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv03374
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ALISHA RICHEY, KIM STAFFORD and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN REAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASPER v. BULLER et al
as 1:2017cv02837
Defendant:
BRYAN D. BULLER, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, ERIC D. ELLIOT and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. GASPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troxel v. Worthy et al
as 1:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Robert Troxel
Defendant:
Richard G Worthy and R Gavin Worthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
