Cases 1 - 10 of 16
HILL v. DU et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
TROY M HILL
Defendant:
MITCHELL RIOS, DU, MS BASS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
TROY M HILL
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, Natasha Barkley, Mike Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Troy M. Hill
as 23-11756
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TROY M. HILL
HILL v. MAZERAC et al
as 4:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
TROY M HILL
Defendant:
JEFFERY MAZERAC, JUSTIN RODGERS and JOSHUA CARSWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Troy M. Hill
as 22-12999
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TROY M. HILL
Troy Monroe Hill v. California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation
as 2:2021cv03875
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation
Petitioner:
Troy Monroe Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lohr, Jr et al v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00189
Plaintiff:
Sooner Ventures LLC, Timothy Hill, Tonja Vaughn and others
Defendant:
E.I. duPont Chemical Corporation, Michael E Johnson, DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinlaw et al v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00188
Defendant:
Michael E Johnson, DuPont de Nemours, Inc., Brian D Long and others
Plaintiff:
M. F. L., C. K., H. N. S. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Anderson County et al
as 8:2020cv01020
Defendant:
Anderson County, Nurse Ashley Wilson, Nurse Lorie Shedd and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Adam Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. D'Albour et al
as 6:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Freddie DeCourt, Aubry Broussard, Todd D'Albour and others
Petitioner:
Troy A Hill
Plaintiff:
Troy Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
