Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Trujillo v. NOVO NORDISK, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv08438
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY INC., NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Plaintiff:
Paul Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02973
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09037
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Creter et al v. Berkeley County South Carolina
as 2:2026cv05329
Defendant:
Berkeley County South Carolina
Plaintiff:
Jessica Trujillo, Andrew Miles-Miller, Matthew Gruber and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Farias Trujillo v. Blanche
as 26-60969
Respondent:
Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Manuel Farias Trujillo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06180
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Trujillo-Santoyo v. Target Corporation
as 1:2026cv13288
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Gladys Trujillo-Santoyo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
GS Holistic v. Vaportoke, et al
as 26-1436
Defendant:
LANCE PAUL, THINGS THAT BUBBLE LLC, DBA Things That Bubble, DANIEL S. TRUJILLO and others
Plaintiff:
GS HOLISTIC, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
