Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Chau v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03326
Plaintiff:
Tuan Chau
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Tinsley v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv09122
Plaintiff:
Tuan Nicholas Tinsley
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv11203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Roy v. Liang et al
as 5:2026cv08757
Plaintiff:
Pratchi Roy
Defendant:
Charles Liang, Yih-Shyan (Wally) Liaw, David Weigand and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Nguyen et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2026cv06864
Plaintiff:
Tuan Nguyen and Phuong Mai Do
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Tu v. Atuta
as 26-20423
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Thanh Tu, also known as Tu Nguyen
Defendant:
Atuta, Incorporated, doing business as Pho Bolsa TV, Vu Hoang Lan, Andrew Le TV and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01823
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00766
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cepeda v. Liang et al
as 3:2026cv07081
Defendant:
Susan Mogensen, Charles Liang, Sara Liu and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cepeda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4213
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
