Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Beard v. Tunnell et al.
as 1:2023cv02389
Plaintiff:
Brian Beard
Defendant:
Christopher Tunnell and James Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tunnel IP LLC v. Dayton Audio, LLC
as 3:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Tunnel IP LLC
Defendant:
Dayton Audio, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Tunnel IP LLC v. Better Bob Products, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Tunnel IP LLC
Defendant:
Better Bob Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Tunnel IP LLC v. School Specialty, LLC
as 1:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Tunnel IP LLC
Defendant:
School Specialty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tunnel IP LLC v. Jatiga Inc.
as 1:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Tunnel IP LLC
Defendant:
Jatiga Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Turn-Key Tunneling, Inc. v. JSJ Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Turn-Key Tunneling, Inc.
Defendant:
JSJ Construction, LLC, Cumberland Valley Constructors, Inc., Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tunnel IP LLC v. Audio-Technica U.S., Inc.
as 5:2021cv00854
Plaintiff:
Tunnel IP LLC
Defendant:
Audio-Technica U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Tunnel IP LLC v. Alpine Electronics of America, Inc.
as 2:2020cv04360
Plaintiff:
Tunnel IP LLC
Defendant:
Alpine Electronics of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Onumonu #303121 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00816
Defendant:
Unknown Party #2, Ra. Wilson, Unknown Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Nosakhare Onumonu #303121
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
