Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Todd Dean v. Mrs. Brown
as 24-6202
Plaintiff:
TODD GLENN DEAN
Defendant:
MRS. BROWN, Warden, MRS. BLUNT, Counselor, MR. PAYNE, Case Manager and others
Dallas Tuttle v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06940
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dallas Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alward et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv06828
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Alward, James Anderson, Matt Deardorff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stewart v. Stewart et al
as 5:2023cv02951
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stewart, Jr
Defendant:
Jeremy Stewart, Karen Tuttle, Stephen Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Lonnie Davis v. Bell
as 22-6369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE BERNARD DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. BELL, D. LEU, MR. TUTTLE and others
US v. Justice Tuttle
as 22-4169
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTICE TODD TUTTLE
Tuttle et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00664
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Tuttle and Okhui Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
