Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hampton v. Tucker et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hampton
Defendant: Lane Tucker, Curtis Vic, Christopher Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Woodmen et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hampton
Defendant: Jonathan Woodmen, Kerry Corass, Katholyn Runnels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Cockrell et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hampton
Defendant: James Cockrell, Andrew Gault, Richard Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Scoble We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hampton
Defendant: Matthew M. Scoble
Hampton v. Tom'e et al
as 3:2023cv00255
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hampton
Defendant: Carol B. Tom'e, Helena Keeney, Robert Bressler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hampton
Defendant: Arnaldo Hernandez and Nom Thai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Houser We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00245
Petitioner: Tyrone Hampton
Respondent: Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Golden State Collective, LLC et al v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2019cv00484
Defendant: Councilman Gene Masuda, City of Pasadena, Councilman John J. Kennedy and others
Plaintiff: Urban Farms Delivery and Golden State Collective, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hampton et al v. Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01984
Plaintiff: Stacey L. Hampton and Tyrone Hampton
Defendant: Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. and Karl Storz GmbH & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hampton v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv10040
Plaintiff: Tyron Hampton
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?