Cases 11 - 20 of 20
City of Alexandria et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 1:2010cv01849
Plaintiff:
City of Alexandria and City of Pineville
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency , U S Dept of Homeland Security , W Craig Fugate and others
Movant:
State of Louisiana , LA Dept of Transportation & Development , Louisiana Office of Coastal Protection and Restoration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ohio Valley Environmental Coal v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1660
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, COAL RIVER MOUNTAIN WATCH and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Party-in-Interest - None:
CONSOL OF KENTUCKY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel, District Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District and and ROBERT L. ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, Chief of Engineers and Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Defendant - None:
ROBERT B. FLOWERS, Lieutenant General, Chief of Engineers and Commander of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Intervenor/Defendant - None:
WEST VIRGINIA COAL ASSOCIATION, KENTUCKY COAL ASSOCIATION, OHIO COAL ASSOCIATION and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN VALLEY COAL COMPANY and APOGEE COAL COMPANY
Ohio Valley Environmental Coal v. West Virginia Coal
as 09-1635
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, COAL RIVER MOUNTAIN WATCH and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Party-in-Interest - None:
CONSOL OF KENTUCKY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - None:
ROBERT L. ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, Chief of Engineers and Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DANA R. HURST, Colonel, District Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District and and ROBERT B. FLOWERS, Lieutenant General, Chief of Engineers and Commander of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
WEST VIRGINIA COAL ASSOCIATION, KENTUCKY COAL ASSOCIATION, OHIO COAL ASSOCIATION and others
Spurlock v. Hurst et al
as 2:2009cv00266
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst
as 5:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lester Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst
as 5:2009cv00123
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lester Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst et al
as 3:2009cv00008
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
North Idaho Community Action Network et al v. Hofmann et al
as 2:2008cv05002
Plaintiff:
North Idaho Community Action Network and William R Lewis
Defendant:
Anthony J Hofmann, Steven R Miles, Robert Van Antwerp and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ohio Valley Environmental Coal v. Elk Run Coal Company
as 07-1355
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, COAL RIVER MOUNTAIN WATCH and WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY
Party-in-Interest:
COAL MAC, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, CARL A. STROCK, Commander and Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, WILLIAM BULEN, Colonel (pty), District Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District and others
Intervenor/Defendant:
MINGO LOGAN COAL COMPANY
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
ARACOMA COAL COMPANY, ELK RUN COAL COMPANY, ALEX ENERGY, INCORPORATED and others
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
ALABAMA COAL ASSOCIATION, ALASKA MINERS ASSOCIATION, COAL OPERATORS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED and others
Laub, et al v. Dept of Interior, et al
as 1:2000cv06601
Plaintiff:
Don Laub , Debbie Jacobsen , Ted Sheely and others
Defendant:
Dept of Interior , Bruce Babbitt, U S Environmental Protection Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
