Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Frazier v. Snider et al
as 1:2022cv01416
Petitioner:
Robert William Frazier
Respondent:
Sean Snider and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cargill v. U.S. Marshals et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00285
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice and U.S. Marshals
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Cargill and Quincetta Y. Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kier v. U.S. Attorney General et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv01025
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Maxwell Federal Prison Camp and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Kier, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Garlock et al (MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00981
Defendant:
Butler County Circuit Clerk, Alabama Attorney General, Wayne Garlock and others
Plaintiff:
Ollie Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
