Cases 21 - 30 of 181
Hutton v. U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 1:2023cv02714
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Hutton
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, The Former Landlords and Former Landlords' Business Affiliates and WRAL News Station Personnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moffat v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 3:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
James Moffat
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552 Armed Forces: Action to Correct Records
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11628
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WINDSOR v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON WINDSOR
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 5:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-60106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tatyana Drevaleva v. Denis McDonough, et al
as 23-15308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
Defendant / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
