Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pound Law LLC v. Vidal et al
as 6:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Pound Law LLC
Defendant:
Kathi Vidal and U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yates v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
as 5:2019cv02350
Defendant:
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Plaintiff:
Samuel Darnell Yates
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BONNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01378
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES PATENT COMMISSION and U.S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madstad Engineering, Inc., et al v. U.S. Patent Office, et al
as 13-13073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MADSTAD ENGINEERING, INC. and MARK STADNYK
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. PATENT OFFICE, DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PAUL v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2012cv00359
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and U.S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY W. PAUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Madstad Engineering, Inc. et al v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office et al
as 8:2012cv01589
Plaintiff:
Madstad Engineering, Inc. and Mark Stadnyk
Defendant:
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office , David Kappos and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gordon v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2010cv23581
Plaintiff:
Todd Gordon
Defendant:
State of Florida, AT&T, Bartow County Court House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Brown v. U.S. Department of Commerce et al
as 8:2007cv02168
Plaintiff:
David W.R. Brown
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. General Accounting Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
