Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 567
McClain et al v. Pence et al
as 1:2022cv23738
Defendant: Charles Terrance Canady, Michael Richard Pence doing business as U.S.A. Inc., Gary Gensler Agency Chairman doing business as US Securities Exchange Commission and others
Plaintiff: Terence M. McClain, Linda N. McClain, Edward G. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
SL-X IP S.A.R.L. v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 21-2697
Plaintiff / Appellant: SL-X IP S.A.R.L., SL-x Technology USA LLC, SL-x Trading Europe Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Credit Suisse Group AG, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and others
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff: Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant: UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv04786
Defendant: Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc., Webster Business Credit Corporation, Bank of America Business Capital and others
Plaintiff: Yorkville Investment I, L.L.C., Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C., Ritchie Special Credit Investments, Ltd. and others
Intervenor: Trustees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SL-X Trading Europe Limited, et al v. Bank Of America Corporation, et al
as 1:2019cv04885
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC, EquiLend Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff: SL-x Trading USA LLC, SL-x Technology UK Ltd., SL-x Trading Europe Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Ronald Chakkow Chan v. UBS AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv04211
Plaintiff: Ronald Chakkow Chan
Defendant: KELLY HO, UBS AG and UBS AG of Zurich
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3775
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co., HSBC Holdings PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Societe Generale, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. and Barclays Bank PLC
Intervenor: California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Axiom Investment Advisors, LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02973
Defendant: Portigon AG, Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff: Axiom Investment Advisors, LLC, Axiom HFT LLC, Axiom Investment Advisors Holdings L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
City of Providence, Rhode v. Bats Global Markets, Inc.
as 22-920
Plaintiff: Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Forsta AP-fonden, StateBoston Retirement System and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Providence, Rhode Island, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Employees' Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands, United Association National Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Wedbush Securities, Inc., Tradework Inc., Bids Trading, L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, L.L.C., The Nasdaq Stock Market L.L.C. and others
Nypl v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 22-698
Petitioner: Lisa McCarthy, an individual, Mad Travel, Inc., AKA Travel Leaders, Valarie Jolly, an individual and others
Respondent: Bank of America, N.A., JP Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corporation and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?