Cases 31 - 40 of 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LANGLEY v. UNITED AIRLINES INC. et al
as 2:2023cv20602
Plaintiff:
BRENDAN LANGLEY
Cross Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES INC.
Defendant:
UNITED GROUND EXPRESS INC., PHILLIPE FRANCOIS RIVERA, EDWARD CETNAR and others
Cross Claimant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY and LOUIS P. KLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Crystal Biton v. United Airlines, et al
as 23-2834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRYSTAL BITON
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, GOVERNOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, New Jersey, HSBC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
