Cases
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Powell et al v. Kendall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv06201
Plaintiff: Steven M Powell , Brian Jordan , James V Morgan and others
Defendant: Donna Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02848
Plaintiff: United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund and others
Defendant: Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff: George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant: Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant: Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent: King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv01168
Plaintiff: United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund and others
Defendant: Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Powell et al v. Don's Finest Foods, Inc.
as 1:2008cv03342
Plaintiff: Steven M. Powell, James V. Morgan, Terry Kramer and others
Defendant: Don's Finest Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al v. SANDOZ, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv01866
Petitioner: SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC., STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., MEIJER, INC. and others
Respondent: SANDOZ, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
DeBartolo v. United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund
as 1:2008cv00845
Plaintiff: Hansel M DeBartolo
Defendant: United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 441 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2004cv05898
Plaintiff: SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 441 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN, MC - UA LOCAL 119 HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Petitioner: PATRICK J. SIMPSON, JONATHAN LEE RICHES, DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In Re: Oxycontin Antitrust Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2004md01603
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Purdue Pharma, Purdue Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Steve White, City of New York, Melinda Wittefeldt and others
Counter Defendant: Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. and Purdue Pharma L.P.
Not Classified By Court: Noramco Inc.
Counter Claimant: Varam, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Petitioner: James R. Dugan, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?