Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Young v. Does et al
as 2:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
David M Young
Defendant:
John Does and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 2:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of Interior, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
Carl Dean Smith
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons and Timothy C Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pachinger v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kenneth John Pachinger
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Doe and Tolliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lewis, Derrick Denton and Mark Evans
Defendant:
T C Outlaw, L Ward, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Henry Alexander Williams
Defendant:
T C Outlaw and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Namer v. USA et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
David I Namer
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruel v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Yueseyuan Cruel
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, A Smith, T Haltiwanger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2009cv00123
Plaintiff:
William E Hawkins
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman v. Ebbert et al
as 2:2009cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Roman
Defendant:
David J Ebbert, Bedford, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
