Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Santee Sioux Nation v. Tso et al
as 8:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Santee Sioux Nation
Defendant:
Roselyn Tso, UNITED STATES INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE;, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas, State of, et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, The and Mayo Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-3725
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Nebraska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, United States of America, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Reliant Care Management Company, L.L.C.
Appellant:
American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Chest Physicians and others
Missouri, State of et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2021cv01329
Plaintiff:
Missouri, State of, Nebraska, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., United States of America, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Interested Party:
Reliant Care Management Company, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Gurpreet Padda, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 21-2823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gurpreet S. Padda, M.D. and Interventional Center for Pain Management, P.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Liz Richter, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Wisconsin Physician Insurance Corporation, doing business as WPS Government Health Administrators
Padda et al v. Becerra et al
as 4:2021cv00492
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Padda, Padda Institute Center for Interventional Pain Management, Gurpreet S. Padda and others
Defendant:
Wisconsin Physician Service Insurance Corporation, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
The Religious Sisters of Mercy, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 21-1890
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of North Dakota, Diocese of Fargo, The Religious Sisters of Mercy and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Human Services, Charlotte Burrows, Chair of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Adventist Health System, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et al
as 21-1589
Defendant / Appellee:
Health Resources and Services Administration, Director, Thomas J. Engels, United Network for Organ Sharing, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary Alex M. Azar, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adventist Health System/SunBelt, Inc., doing business as AdventHealth Orlando, Medical University Hospital Authority, Alexander Berrios, Jr. and others
Adventist Health System/SunBelt, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
United Network for Organ Sharing, Thomas J. Engels, The University of Alabama Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
University of Iowa, Medical University Hospital Authority, University of Kansas Hospital Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Regional Home Health Care, Inc v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 20-3239
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, NCI Information Systems, Inc., an NCI Company, doing business as AdvanceMed Corporation and Does 1-10
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Regional Home Health Care, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
