Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff: Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant: Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Dunn et al v. Penfield et al
as 5:2023cv05025
Plaintiff: Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant: Shane Penfield, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv01091
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Embrey v. State of North Dakota et al
as 3:2019cv00080
Defendant: State of North Dakota, Unknown Individuals and Wayne Stenehyem
Plaintiff: William J.R. Embrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Smith v. Larry Norris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1273
Plaintiff - Appellant: Mark Smith
Defendant - Appellee: Larry Norris, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as former Director of the Arkansas Department of Corrections, Ray Hobbs, in his individual and official capacity as current Director of the Arkansas Department of Corrections, Dale Reed, in his individual capacity and as Warden of Ouachita River Correctional Unit and others
Postma et al v. Bradley et al
as 0:2007cv04657
Plaintiff: Harold O Postma and Greta K Postma
Defendant: Ralff Bradley, Roger Knapper, Leann Knapper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Choate v. Aleshire et al
as 3:2007cv05010
Plaintiff: Jack Choate
Defendant: Mark Aleshire, Christen Shilling, Linda Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?