Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv04140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paula Hinojosa v. Vianev Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02298
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, UPS Expedited Mail Services, Inc., Vianev Inc. dba The UPS Store #0015 and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Hinojosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bates v. UPS Expedited Mail Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kaneshia Bates
Defendant:
UPS Expedited Mail Services, Inc. , Snelling Staffing, LLC and Snelling Employment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GOTHAM DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO., INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06165
Plaintiff:
GOTHAM DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO., INC. and UPS EXPEDITED MAIL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERGUSON et al v. UPS EXPEDITED MAIL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv03881
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. FERGUSON and JUANITA FERGUSON
Defendant:
UPS EXPEDITED MAIL SERVICES, INC. , UPS MAIL INNOVATIONS, INC. , UNITED PARCEL SERVICES, INC. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
RIGGS & COMPANY , UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and JANE DOES 1-10
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
RMX , UPS MAIL INNOVATIONS, INC. , UNITED PARCEL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
XACTA 3000 v. UPS EXPEDITED MAIL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv02149
Plaintiff:
XACTA 3000
Defendant:
UPS EXPEDITED MAIL SERVICES, INC., UPS, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
