Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gabig et al v. US Department of Justice et al
as 5:2022cv01595
Plaintiff:
Jerome S. Gabig and ORBIS Sibro Inc
Defendant:
US Department of Justice and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Todd v. Tuscaloosa, City of et al
as 7:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tami A Todd
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa, City of, Walter Maddox and Executive Office of United States Attorneys, US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stokes v. US Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00602
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, US Department of Justice and Cheron Nash
Plaintiff:
Terence L Stokes, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Walton v. United States Treasury Department et al
as 2:2018cv01646
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs, Regions Bank Officials, State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dwayne Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruco Securities LLC v. US Department of Justice
as 2:2018cv00596
Plaintiff:
Pruco Securities LLC
Defendant:
US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Garrett v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2017cv00897
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Garrett, Jr
Defendant:
US Department of Justice and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCallup v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2010cv02221
Plaintiff:
Veronica McCallup
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Eric H Holder, Jr, State of California Justice Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ovwurie v. Napolitano et al
as 4:2009cv01127
Petitioner:
Thompson Ovwurie
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, Eric Holder, US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
