Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wint v. US Dept of Veterans Affairs 28 USC 2675(a) & 14.9
as 0:2023cv60761
Plaintiff:
Fritz Garnett Wint
Defendant:
US Dept of Veterans Affairs 28 USC 2675(a) & 14.9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Mayer v. Veterans Affairs
as 2:2022cv11442
Plaintiff:
Timothy P Mayer
Defendant:
US Dept of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Franson v. US Dept. of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2019cv01983
Defendant:
Daniel Hoonyul Bang and US Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
James W Franson, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chapman v. US Dept of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2019cv01516
Plaintiff:
Debra Keef Chapman
Defendant:
US Dept of Veterans Affairs, United States of America and Wound Care Nurse-in-Charge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jorgensen v. US. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
as 3:2017cv01095
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roy Jorgensen
Defendant:
US. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rosario-Gonzalez, et al v. US, et al
as 12-2343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ and JUAN VELEZ-PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, SERVICIOS DE SALUD EN EL HOGAR Y HOSPICIO SAN LUCAS, INC. and CLINICAL MEDICAL SERVICES FOR VA
Defendant:
VAMC and US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Regional Office
Rosario-Gonzalez, et al v. US, et al
as 12-2342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ and JUAN VELEZ-PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, SERVICIOS DE SALUD EN EL HOGAR Y HOSPICIO SAN LUCAS, INC. and CLINICAL MEDICAL SERVICES FOR VA
Defendant:
VAMC and US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Regional Office
Luther et al v. USA et al
as 3:2010cv00699
Plaintiff:
Ronald Luther and Emma Luther
Defendant:
USA and US Dept of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ramirez-Carlo, et al v. United States
as 06-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SILVESTRE RAMIREZ-CARLO and FRANCISCA PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
