Cases 81 - 90 of 246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00877
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Green v. US Foods, Inc., et al.
as 2:2020cv02673
Plaintiff:
Randall Green
Defendant:
US Foods, Inc., John Does 1-5, Fictitious Defendants and USF Propco II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alex Guerrero et al v. US Foods, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04545
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, inclusive, US Foods, Inc. and US Foods, Inc. doing business as US Foodservice, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff:
Manuel Antonio Rios and Alex Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US Foods, Inc. v. Biloxi Lodging, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00138
Defendant:
Biloxi Lodging, Inc.
Plaintiff:
US Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US Foods, Inc. v. LOD Ballpark Buffet, LLC
as 4:2020cv02378
Defendant:
LOD Ballpark Buffet, LLC, a California limited liability company, Nick Bovis and LOD Ballpark Buffet, LLC
Plaintiff:
US Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELLAMONICA v. US. FOODS et al
as 2:2020cv03683
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS (1-10) (fictitious names), US FOODS, INC., JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
CARMINE DELLAMONICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rolon v. Diamler Trust et al
as 1:2020cv01673
Plaintiff:
MELANIO ROLON
Defendant:
US FOODS, INC., ROBERT WASCH and DIAMLER TRUST
Arbitrator:
William G Binckes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US FOODS, INC. v. TRUE BRANDS, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00823
Defendant:
TRUE BRANDS, LLC, PAYAM TABIBIAN and TRUE BRANDS TIVOLI LLC
Plaintiff:
US FOODS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
