Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Arbino v. US Marshall Service et al
as 1:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
Tom Arbino
Defendant:
US Marshall Service and Cincinnati Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert Smith v. USA, et al
as 11-6437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, CAROL PAVILACK GETTY and others
Defendant:
US PAROLE COMMISSION, US MARSHALL SERVICE and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Noland v. McCoy et al
as 5:2011cv00312
Plaintiff:
Leon R. Noland, Jr.
Defendant:
William McCoy, II, Ron Bishop, US Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. US Marshal
as 2:2011cv02773
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Williams
Defendant:
US Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert Smith v. USA, et al
as 11-5966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US PAROLE COMMISSION, US MARSHALL SERVICE and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Arhebamen v. St Clair County Jail et al
as 2:2011cv13513
Plaintiff:
Mark Arhebamen
Defendant:
St Clair County Jail, Olijnik, Seppo and others
Herbert Smith v. USA, et al
as 11-5895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US PAROLE COMMISSION, US MARSHALL SERVICE and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noland v. Attorney General of Commonwealth et al
as 5:2011cv00061
Petitioner:
Leon Rozell Noland, Jr.
Respondent:
Attorney General of Commonwealth, Sheriff , Governor of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paula Milligan, et al v. USA, et al
as 10-5615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAULA ANN MILLIGAN and HAROLD MONTGOMERY MILLIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US MARSHALS SERVICE, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
